While the individuality and subjectivity of gymnastics is
one of the sport’s greatest assets, with it comes an imbalance of excellence
amongst its competitors. In running, whoever runs the fastest wins. In javelin,
whoever throws the furthest wins. In gymnastics, though, there is a diversity
of talent so great that gold and silver medallists on a discipline can resemble
competitors in different sports.
The result is this: there is rarely one competitor who has
it all. There may never have been a gymnast who was without weaknesses that
were (or are) better performed by other competitors. In avoidance of writing a
dull Euros anticipation, and to satisfy a desire to write something a bit
flippant and fun, I got to thinking about “building” perfect gymnasts from the
components of real life competitors (don’t worry, this doesn’t involve any
hypothetical dismemberment).
If you could combine favourites to fill in their weaknesses,
who would you put together?
Jordyn Wieber's power
with Li Xuan’s leaps and lines and Lilia Podkopayeva’s forward acrobatic
ability
I love Jordyn Wieber. Her power is really impressive and on
the whole, her form is good too. In Tokyo, Christine Still remarked of Wieber:
“she seems to have so much time in the air on her leaps”. Youtube commenters
seemed to take issue with this, possibly because Jordyn is not a classic
graceful gymnast with whom leaps are most associated, but she does have the
ability to generate a lot of height from nowhere which makes her leaps pretty
impressive.
However, she doesn’t have the classical grace and
flexibility that many others have had. Liu Xuan competed some of my favourite
beam leaps of all time: amazing flexibility, grace and poise without being as
waifish as other competitors. A dash of Liu Xuan into Wieber’s beam leaps would
take her beam work from great to exceptional, in my humble opinion.
This is too beautiful for any caption to do it justice.
With a very secure Amanar vault, a history of top shelf bars
dismounts and a double double on floor, Jordyn is not what you would call
acrobatically challenged. She does, however, famously struggle with forward
acrobatic elements. This weakness goes some way to explain her lack of second
vault and the reason for no forward giant work in her bars set. Indeed, her
only regularly competed forwards acrobatic skill is a punch front layout from a
2.5 twist on floor: an element that has been far the most inconsistent piece of
gymnastics in her repertoire.
One of Lilia’s many outstanding talents was a plethora of
forward acrobatic skills; not least on floor, where to this day her forward
tumbling series look the most solid and secure. With even a hint of Lilia’s
forwards ability Jordyn would have many more secure skills to choose from.
Ali Raisman’s difficulty
and solidity with Anna Pavlova’s dance and execution
A few years ago everyone seemed to be pretty fond of Raisman.
She had some exciting skills, a nice attitude, but most of all a stunning
consistency (on all but bars) that made her appear far more experienced than
she actually was. Sadly, a lot of the internet community has gone a bit cool on
Raisman recently, most likely because of Jana Bieger syndrome: upgrading
difficulty before mastering execution, something which turns a lot of old
school gymnastics fans right off. Despite this, the fact remains that Raisman
performs some fantastic gymnastics very solidly and cleanly.
Conversely, Anna Pavlova is a gymnast who seems to be
universally loved (or at least pretty universally non-hated). Her career is one marred
by inconsistency and a lack of difficulty, but characterised by amazing
attention to detail. Her presentation and dance are frequently cited as the
amongst the best of modern times, with her Beijing floor routine frequently
used as an example of artistry over difficulty. If Raisman could perform her
skills with the execution and poise of Pavlova, she would be a formidable
competitor. She can keep her own twisting form, though.
A blast from the
past: Mo Huilan with Gina Gogean’s consistency
Mo Huilan is up there with Cheng Fei for the most well known
and well celebrated Chinese WAG gymnasts; but unlike Cheng, Mo never really
capitalized on her potential. Sure, she won a vault silver in 1996 and the beam
title in 1995. However, here was a gymnast whose routines on bars, beam and
vault were not only good: they would have contended for gold. Mo could have
left Atlanta with an AA medal and three EF medals. But she didn’t. Why? Because
she was always held back by inconsistency.
Gina Gogean’s career tells a very different story. The
statistics tell is that Gina is one of the most successful female gymnasts of
all time (she has 20 world and Olympic medals in her cabinet), however, you
would struggle to find many fans who would list Gina amongst their all time
favourites. Why? Because Gina’s medals were won through a rock solid
consistency and an amazing ability to perform in the most stressful of situations, not for their originality or ingenuity.
Together, they would make a stellar combination of original,
beautiful and difficult gymnastics performed with a rock hard consistency.
Beth Tweddle with
Jordyn Wieber’s confidence and expression
Beth is a fantastic bar worker, and a brilliant tumbler.
This is known. What is also known is that she has always been lacking in the artistry
and expression department. Unlike previous examples this is not a case of
execution: Beth is a very clean gymnast, with beautiful toe point and good
form. This is a case of musical interpretation and the presentation of
choreography.
I have mentioned before on this blog that Beth should draw
inspiration from people like Chellsie Memmel, whose floor performance at the
2008 Olympic trials is one of the most memorable American routines of all time
(for me, anyway). I say Chellsie specifically because as an athlete, she is not
dissimilar to Beth. Neither Beth nor Chellsie lend themselves easily to classic
graceful expression or balletic precision. However Chellsie never let this get
in the way of her floor routines, whereas Beth always has.
However I used Jordyn Wieber in this example because on
recent reflection, I think that her current routine may be my favourite non
balletic floor routine of all time. With it, she has truly shown that a
gripping, well choreographed routine with great attention to musical detail can
be performed by a “power gymnast” with no classical technique. If it were up to
me, Wieber would medal with her floor routine in London because it is a
highlight of the quad as far as I am concerned.
I think much of Wieber’s floor success probably comes from
embracing her weaknesses and being sure to deliver with confidence. Beth has
never had a floor routine she looked comfortable with, despite her good
tumbling. With a dash of Wieber Beth could be as great on floor as she is on
bars (or at least be closer).
Rebecca Bross’s bars
execution and beam attack with Mckayla Maroney’s twisting form and vaulting
I just had to combine these athletes for an example, because
in many ways I think they will have to combine to make their countries Olympic
team this year. Not as literally as this article postulates, obviously, but to
my mind they will come as a pair if they come at all. Why? Because Maroney
fills in Becca’s gaps, and vice versa. Becca can put up team final worthy beam
and bars (hypothetically) and Maroney can give a showstopping vault and TF
worthy floor - areas Becca is unlikely to get back.
In the more literal sense of the article, Bross has few real
weaknesses but if ever there was one it is her vault. Maroney on the other hand
had one huge strength but this in itself is her weakness, because she may not
be able to provide enough on her own. Together they would have it all.
THE ULTIMATE - Elena Produnova’s forwards power with
Svetlana Khorkina’s grace and UB lines, Ekaterina Lobaznyuk’s floor and beam
acrobatics and Elena Zamolodchikova’s twisting ability.
Wow.
Pictures: http://www.liger.org/images/liger.jpg, http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2qn173CNf1rt739ko7_500.jpg, http://www.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID19152/images/resized_Raisman_floor_switch_ring_AP_Gretchen_Ertl.jpg, http://www.insidegymnastics.com/content/articlefiles/383-28.jpg, http://www.chinaplaza.com/games96/images/hmo.jpg, http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/46569000/jpg/_46569591_tweddlepose_512.jpg, http://0.tqn.com/d/gymnastics/1/0/w/9/-/-/McKaylaMaroney2011natsRonaldMartinezGETTY121591429.jpg
"THE ULTIMATE - Elena Produnova’s forwards power with Svetlana Khorkina’s grace and UB lines, Ekaterina Lobaznyuk’s floor and beam acrobatics and Elena Zamolodchikova’s twisting ability."
ReplyDeleteLOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE!!!!
Awesome post! :)
Am I the only person in the world who does not get the love for Chellsie Memmel's 2008 Olympic Trials routine? Why in the heck do people love this routine so much? Chellsie's never been good on floor, but that 2008 routine was one of her worst ever.
ReplyDeleteAshlyn: glad you like!
ReplyDeleteLola: Thanks for the comment. I understand people not liking it because as I said she is not a natural dancer and didn't have a great deal of choreography. For me, and I think most other people, it was about the powerful music and the brilliant tumbling. Mainly in the first half: starting with that sky high Dos Santos and then coming straight back with a double layout. That and her landings, particularly the last.
Perhaps also people remember it because it was to be her last, with her pre-Olympic injury preventing her from competing it in Beijing.
All opinions respected, but I have to disagree with you that it was her worst. I understand why you might not like it though.